Category Archives: Civil Liberties

Atheists A Large Voting Bloc In Florida Than Jews

An interesting paragraph in The New Republics, “Mis-Schlep” this morning:

All this fuss seems to be misdirected. It is not as though Jewish voters make up an especially large share of the electorate. Just five percent of voters were Jewish in the 2004 elections in Florida, and they split their votes 80/20 for John Kerry, hardly qualifying them as the most unpredictable swing demographic. By comparison, atheists made up 11 percent of Florida’s electorate–but you can’t find any Atheists for Obama yard signs.

I’m a non-believer and a rationalist and the inherent qualities in an atheist tend to make them less subservient to the herd mentalities that control organized religion. We FreeThinkers now find ourselves trying to group together in an effort to practice organized movement toward a shared goal. One of those main goals is countering control of religion in our society, culture and – mainly – government. It’s working and we’re growing by leaps and bounds, but still, we’re not a recognized voting bloc (we lean liberal anyhow) or discussed in Mainstream Media. Look for that to change in the coming years – especially as we are one of the most vocal supporters of gay marriage rights.

Politics of Personal Responsibility an Abysmal Failure

I don’t know when people will learn that the politics of personal responsibility, pure free market ideals, and the false idea sold to us as American capitalism leads to wealth being hoarded at the top, a weak middle class and, thus, a weak economy. If this financial crisis doesn’t hammer it home for most people, I don’t know what will.

A couple articles on Truthdig describe the failures of this policy and one of the safety nets for preventing it from occurring again.

“Whatever Happend to Personal Responsibility?” by Ellen Goodman:

In the economy even more than the culture, personal responsibility has been a best-seller. We were told by conservatives and free-market holy rollers that markets were smart and governments were dumb, that the government was the problem not the solution. So when credit cards come through the mail, college freshmen are expected to just say no. When poor people were wooed and seduced by subprime mortgages, they are the ones dubbed irresponsible.

Over time, the same rhetoric justified a huge shift in economic risks of the average citizen. In the name of the ownership society, many pensions became 401(k)s while health insurance costs moved from employer to employee. All of these risks were covered like a bad bet by the idea that people could take better care of themselves.

The ownership society turned into the everyone-on-your-own society. Three years ago, Congress passed a law making it harder for people to declare bankruptcy. Just six months ago, Henry Paulson, the treasury secretary who now wants to be czar, insisted the government actions to prevent mortgage foreclosures would “do more harm than they would do good.”

Of course we do not want an over-legislated citizenry. The problem is that Republicans confuse good governance with impeding freedoms. It is in fact the political left that protects civil liberties and freedoms far more than the right. The are mechanisms through which the business sector – which will have some regulation no matter who receives the most votes – can receive appropriate oversight.

“A Special Prosecutor for Wall Street,” by Joe Conason: (an important read especially for those in favor of limited government)

Anyone who doubts that massive fraud is at the center of this crisis hasn’t been reading between the lines. While much coverage in the business press has focused on tick-tock accounts of the final days of the big investment houses or the vagaries of the roiling market, there is no shortage of stories showing how we got into this morass.

The simple version of this decentralized criminal conspiracy can be summarized as follows: Mortgage lenders handed out loans to unqualified borrowers and sometimes tricked them into signing agreements they could not fulfill. Those same companies and others then marketed those loans with false assurances of their soundness to convince investors to buy them. Some of those investors then resold the packages of crap mortgages to other investors both here and abroad. Among the miscreants implicated in these activities were many with actual criminal records, whose entry into the mortgage industry was in no way hindered by the state regulatory agencies. They proceeded to amass fortunes large and small, using the same techniques familiar from previous financial scandals—pressurized sales techniques; targeting of the weak, elderly and insecure; outright fraud, forgery and deception.

Which of the participants knew what was going on here? Which of them merely failed to perform any due diligence before passing along undue risk to the individual investors, pension funds and others to whom they owed fiscal prudence? Which companies and executives actively encouraged thievery, and which simply looked away while they booked big profits?

Those are the questions that must be sorted out by competent judicial authorities if we are ever to establish the rule of law in our markets. The FBI is currently investigating more than 20 lenders, including the defunct Indymac, but there is much more to be done—and at the moment, the prosecutors seem to have set their sights too low. Someone with prosecutorial authority and resources should scrutinize the major players at UBS, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers and all the rest. The passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley law was meant to discourage this kind of financial chicanery by major firms. Now is the time to apply its criminal sanctions to those who flouted the law.

State authorities, whose years of incompetence and negligence led directly to the debacle, cannot be trusted to enforce the law now. In Florida, for example, which has suffered the worst of the national epidemic of mortgage fraud, the state regulators were recently found to have permitted thousands of brokers with criminal records—including actual bank robbers!—to enter the marketplace. The best estimate is that up to 25 percent of the mortgages recorded in the Sunshine State over the past few years were tainted.

Whether it comes to the pharmaceutical industry, health insurance, the credit industry, the energy industry, we need regulation and oversight.

One of the largest problems we have is that our government – all sides of the aisle – are in cahoots with these robber barons.

Our vote is the most powerful tool we have and we must collectively demand an end to corporate political donations, further increase in the limitations on lobbyist influence, elect politicians – especially at the executive level – who will put a stop to the rampant criminal activity influencing the policies that govern our lives.

The Republicans call for personal responsibility for poor, unwed teenage mothers, minimum wage workers, credit card users. When it comes to industrial giants, however, Repubs are off the clock – as well as many Democrats. Until the American electorate decides to exercise informed voting and support a multi-party system, this collusion and illegal cooperation will continue.

Al Gore Calls Upon Young People To Be Civilly Disobedient To Stop Coal Plants

Mkay… During Clinton’s Global Initiative, Gore said,

If you’re a young person looking at the future of this planet and looking at what is being done right now, and not done, I believe we have reached the stage where it is time for civil disobedience to prevent the construction of new coal plants that do not have carbon capture and sequestration.

I believe for a carbon company to spend money convincing the stock-buying public that the risk from the global climate crisis is not that great represents a form of stock fraud because they are misrepresenting a material fact. I hope these state attorney generals around the country will take some action on that.

I’m not saying I disagree – recently, American citizens have largely ceded much of their influence on the government by refusing civil disorder.

Still, it’s somehow like going nude on a European beach. I just can’t do it. I suppose I could if I lived next door to a planned coal plant… Dammit, it’s time for some surrection and uprising and gettin’ arrested!

Mukasey Gets Something Right

Miracles do happen.

A horrifyingly “flawed” decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals threatened to send a woman who had been genitally mutilated back to Mali. According to the court, the woman had already been mutilated, so she need not fear such maltreatment again. First of all, woman are repeatedly mutilated in Mali. Second, the woman faced an arranged marriage and having her potential female children genitally mutilated. The U.S. Attorney General gave the rare opinion that the woman should not be deported and deserves a mountain of gratitude for the action.

It is not clear who on the Board of Immigration Appeals participated in this decision. The board’s members are listed as: Juan P. Osuna, Chairman, Charles Adkins-Blanch, Patricia A. Cole, Lauri S. Filppu, Edward R. Grant, Anne J. Greer, Frederick D. Hess, David B. Holmes, Garry D. Malphrus, Neil P. Miller, Hugh Mullane, Roger Pauley and Linda S. Wendtland.

Obviously, some of these members need to be replaced. Such a short-sighted opinion offends the very basic nature of humanity. Perhaps years of hearing these deportation appeals has dulled their sense of good and fairness. Whatever the reason, their time of efficacy is over and they have forgotten the very essence of America’s soul. The decision was shameful and sickening.

Executive Branch Continues Trend Toward Authoritarianism

You know that whole “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!” philosophy for which we Americans are so famous? And you know how the Bush administration has been squashing it one civil liberty at a time? Well, the George W. Bush band plays on into the very twilight of his term.

Reuters reported Friday that the Justice Department new rules for the FBI, which will kick in Oct. 1,

Justice Department and FBI officials told a news briefing the changes would allow agents in some terrorism cases to use informants, do physical surveillance and conduct interviews without identifying themselves or their true purpose.

They said such techniques currently could be used in ordinary criminal cases, but not for those involving national security, before an investigation has begun.

Not a big deal? Remember, that these laws the government erects to “protect us” and “keep us secure” can easily be misused to inappropriately prey on U.S. citizens. Of course, red flags at the ACLU went up,

The American Civil Liberties Union expressed concern the rewritten rules had been drafted in a way to allow the FBI to begin surveillance without factual evidence to back it up.

It said that under the new guidelines, a person’s race or ethnic background could be used as a factor in opening an investigation, a move the ACLU believes will institute racial profiling as a matter of policy.

Would a McCain administration continue this town spiral toward authoritianism? You bet your ass.

Latest Attacks on Free Speech Around the Globe

1. Malaysian policie arrested top anti-government blogger Raja Petra Raja Kamarudin, who runs website Malaysia Today. Malaysian law allows for the “indefinite detention” of those arrested without a trial. Ring a bell? That’s right. In a similar move, the Bush administration disregarded Habeas Corpus for the prisoners in Guantanamo. Habeas Corpus is designed to protect us from arbitrary state action, limiting the government’s ability to morph into an authoritarian regime. With the aid of Dick Cheney, and Justice Department officials who play the semantics game loosely with the law and Constitution, however, George W. Bush started to build a coffin for the freedoms inherent in The United States of America.

Freedom of speech is the most important freedom of all and the Malaysian government is once again rearing grotesque and inhumane domination of their citizens. It is a shame in a country that wields a large influence on the Asian geopolitical stage. My computer could not connect to Malaysiatoday.com. Coincidence? I think not! (okay, nevermind. I just logged on…)

2. I saw this piece yesterday and almost spit my white tea (it’s my new thing) all over the computer screen. According to the British TimesOnline, Italian comic Sabina Guzzanti is being threatened with a 1929 law “which stipulates that an insult to the Pope carries the same penalty as an insult to the Italian President.” She could serve five years in prison. What’d she do?

She merely said,

“But then, within 20 years the Pope will be where he ought to be — in Hell, tormented by

gotta love a good phallic symbol

gotta love a good phallic symbol

great big poofter devils, and very active ones, not passive ones.”(I’m sure that’s the British translation, not American)

First of all, I didn’t know it was illegal to insult the Italian President. Can you imagine if that were the law here? Eight-five percent of the country would be on lockdown. What would prison race gangs do then? Write really, really mean blogs about each other?

In any case, I call upon Giovanni Ferrara, Rome prosecutor, to pull his head out of his ass. The fact that he’s threatening the Guzzanti with these charges brought more attention to her comments than otherwise. Furthermore, if he decides to pursue this case, she’ll hightail it up to the Council of Europe (where I interned, once upon a time) and make this a huge international scandal. Also, didn’t baby jesus teach forgiveness or something?